|
Extract from "The
Medical and Surgical Practice of NaProTechnology"
Dr. PHIL C. BOYLE, Family Physician, Galway, Ireland.
INTRODUCTION
Infertility is a
significant problem for many couples in the developed world today.
Up to 1 in 5 couples experience difficulty conceiving in the United
States1. In Europe 1 in 6 couples have difficulty
conceiving2. Current infertility protocols usually advise
blood tests on day 3 to 7 of the menstrual cycle to assess
gonadotrophin and prolactin levels, thyroid function, hemoglobin,
rubella status and testosterone levels – if clinically indicated. In
addition bloods tests are usually taken on day 21 or 22 of
the cycle to measure progesterone levels in the probable mid-luteal
phase of the menstrual cycle. Most specialists would agree that
ovulation is probably occurring if progesterone levels exceed 30
nmol/l (9.5 ng/dl). After a seminal fluid analysis, post-coital
test, ultrasound examination, laparoscopy and dye test and possibly
a six to nine month trial of clomid those couples who have not
conceived face the prospect of Artificial Reproductive Technology
(ART) if they wish to continue fertility treatment. Occasionally
ovulation induction with FSH (with or without intrauterine
insemination) may be given for a further 3 to 6 cycles before
embarking upon In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) or Intra-cytoplasmic
Sperm Injection (ICSI), which we refer to as ART throughout this
chapter.
NaProTechnology (NPT)
is a new, safe and effective means of treating infertility that can
avoid the perceived need for ART in many cases. NaProTechnology is a
couple-centered, disease-based approach to investigate, diagnose and
treat infertility. The term “Natural” refers to the method of
conception through a natural act of intercourse as opposed to any
artificial intervention which replaces intercourse. Clinical
experience and retrospective studies3 show great promise,
however further prospective studies are needed to determine present
day success rates and convince the greater medical community of the
value of NPT fertility treatment.
Ideally couples
should learn how to track the signs of fertility and understand
their fertility potential, even before attempting conception.
Couples who use Creighton Model FertilityCare™ System4
(CrMFCS) for family planning have a distinct advantage over
non-users. They can tell, even before they try to conceive, if they
may be at risk of miscarriage or infertility based on their CrMFCS
charting pattern. This is very useful information to help them make
an informed decision about managing their fertility in a way which
is appropriate to them. If couples experience infertility or
miscarriage NPT should be their first choice to identify and treat
whatever abnormalities may be found.
But what about
couples who were unaware of the NPT approach and have tried all of
the medical treatments available to them, including artificial
reproductive technologies (ART) without success? Is it worth trying
NPT at this point or are they simply wasting their time?
Experience from a
Family Practice in Galway, Ireland has shown that 20% to 30% of
couples with previously unsuccessful ART will have a successful
pregnancy with NPT. This chapter will look at that select group of
patients who have succeeded with NPT after failed ART.
BACKGROUND
NPT has been
available to Irish patients since 2nd Feb 1998. It was
not known at that time how effective this treatment would be for
infertile couples who had otherwise finished with fertility
treatment. Patients were told that because NPT was a new approach we
could not predict what the probability of success would be.
This Chapter will
focus on the number of couples who have conceived with NPT, despite
previously failed ART. We will look at 6 years of clinical practice
in a Family Physician’s office from the beginning of Feb. 1998 until
Feb. 2004. The percentage success rate is only available for the
first 4 years of practice and will be presented in a Life Table
Analysis.
It is important to
bear in mind that the effectiveness of NPT improved over time as the
physicians offering treatment gained greater experience and it is
likely to be even more effective than present results would
indicate. Also, a key factor in giving couples the best chance of
success is for them to complete 12 effective cycles of treatment
which can take from 18 to 24 months after beginning the program.
Unfortunately many couples gave up prior to reaching this desired
end point, largely because the goals of treatment were not clearly
outlined by their physicians from the outset.
STUDY GROUP
All patients with previously unsuccessful ART
who conceived with NPT treatment through a Family Physician’s
practice in Galway, Ireland were included in this study, between 2nd
Feb 1998 and 1st Feb 2004. 4 patients were excluded from
the study because 2 were already pregnant at the initial medical
consultation and a further 2 previously had a successful pregnancy
with IVF prior to conceiving with NPT.
95 Patients conceived 123 times. The average
female age per conception was 36.8 years, with a range from 28 to 47
years. The couples had been trying to conceive for an average of 6.1
years and had 176 failed attempts at ART, with 175 unsuccessful
embryo Transfers. There was an average of 2 unsuccessful attempts at
ART per couple. (See Table 1.)
TABLE 1. Profile of ENTIRE GROUP - 95
Couples
|
|
Average |
Range |
Total |
|
Female Age |
36.8 years |
28 – 47 years |
|
|
Years trying to conceive |
6.1 years |
2 – 13 years |
|
|
Attempts at ART |
1.85 |
1 - 7 |
176 |
|
Attempts at Embryo Transfer |
1.84 |
0 - 5 |
175 |
RESULTS WITH NPT
TREATMENT
There were 123
conceptions from 95 couples, resulting in 89 successful pregnancies
from 74 of the couples. Fourteen out of the 74 couples had a second
successful pregnancy and one had a third success with NPT. 21 of
those who did conceive had a miscarriage (16) or ectopic pregnancy
(4) as the final outcome. (Table 2.)
There were 3 twin
pregnancies, giving a rate of 3.4% per live birth or 2.4% per
conception.
TABLE 2.
|
|
|
|
Total number of
Conceptions |
123 |
|
Total number of
couples conceiving |
95 |
|
Total number of Live
Births |
89 |
|
Total number of
couples with at least 1 Live Birth or ongoing pregnancy |
74 |
|
Total number with at
least 2 Live Births |
14 |
|
Total number with at
least 3 Live Births |
1 |
|
Total number of
couples with ectopic / Miscarriage |
4 + 17 = 21 |
|
Total number of twins |
3 |
|
Twin Rate per live
birth |
3/89 = 3.4% |
A Life Table
analysis shows the success rate of treatment from the first four
years of practice. The figures for 6 years have not yet been
calculated.
This
table shows the adjusted proportion achieving pregnancy is 26.2%
at 12 to 17 months, rising to 32.6% for 18 to 25 months in the programme.
FOR
COMPLETE CHAPTER WITH REFERENCES CLICK HERE
Compare with European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology 2004 REPORT HERE (note deliveries per IVF cycle started in Ireland Table VI = 18.4%, But the clinical pregnancies are confusingly reported as 30.4% It can be very difficult for the public to understand true success rates with this kind of reporting!)
|